|
arossphoto
|
 |
« on: January 06, 2010, 12:10:02 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 12:16:23 AM by arossphoto »
|
Logged
|
Andrew
|
|
|
|
bluemike
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2010, 12:22:33 AM » |
|
That's a great build and yes you did use some very interesting designs Congrats ! now in due time please let us know how it sounds 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pat On the ropes not dead yet
|
|
|
daiwok
Administrator
Member
Offline
Age: 39
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 4247
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2010, 12:31:12 AM » |
|
GENIUS ! I was playing with a stock Lenco and commented to a number of friends how much I love the simplicity of using them. Would very much like to make a new plinth in stock size and here we go ! We have have it perfect ! Love the VTA adjustment, just love everything about it !  Except the rubber feet on the armboard  I think you are better off with screws from the underside coming through from the bottom layer acting as supports / spikes.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 12:33:08 AM by daiwok »
|
Logged
|
David  Vinyl is BLACK MAGIC
|
|
|
|
arossphoto
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2010, 12:47:11 AM » |
|
Wow, thanks for the positive response. I wasn't sure about the rubber feet either. I was trying to find some small brass cones, but didn't think about using screws. My concern with screws would be getting the pillar level. I was also thinking about taking this idea to the next level by using a double decker inspired design. It would be very easy to cut out the bottom layer then increase the height of the pillar and attach it to a separate plinth underneath the main plinth. I'm still thinking about doing that.
Thanks again,
Andrew
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 12:48:55 AM by arossphoto »
|
Logged
|
Andrew
|
|
|
daiwok
Administrator
Member
Offline
Age: 39
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 4247
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2010, 12:49:13 AM » |
|
Wow, thanks for the positive response. I wasn't sure about the rubber feet either. I was trying to find some small brass cones, but didn't think about using screws. My concern with screws would be getting the pillar level. I was also thinking about taking this idea to the next level by using a double decker inspired design. It would be very easy to cut out the bottom layer then increase the height of the pillar and attached to a separate plinth underneath the main plinth. I'm still thinking about doing that.
Thanks again,
Andrew
Good points Andrew !! I have tried rubber in the past and it seems to smear the sound no matter where I use it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
David  Vinyl is BLACK MAGIC
|
|
|
|
arossphoto
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2010, 02:11:29 AM » |
|
I think brass bolts with the tips ground to a point might work better than screws. If I can find some with allen heads I could drill and tap the bottom layer, and then I'd be able to fine tune the height by reaching under the plinth and turning the bolts. I'll definitely give that a try.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 02:18:27 AM by arossphoto »
|
Logged
|
Andrew
|
|
|
rfgumby
Administrator
Member
Offline
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 4856
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2010, 05:13:41 AM » |
|
I love that build Andrew. It never ceases to amaze me how many variations our awesome members come up with to make the builds their own. Congratulations on some inspirational ideas and some creative thinking to boot. The side adjustment for VTA is great.
I do have to agree with David about the rubber footers under the tone arm pod however, I think you'll have better results with a rigid mount or small brass cones. Floating arm pods rarely give the rigidity you need for good frequency extension and focus.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Scott
When I told Ed he should smoke some pot, I think he misunderstood. You know the translation between English and Texan is a bit vague at times...
|
|
|
reinderspeter
Administrator
Member
Offline
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1683
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2010, 08:13:17 AM » |
|
That looks great! and a lot of very clever ideas in there  I agree with David and Scott about the rubber though 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Peter
Traditional scientific method has always been at the very best 20-20 hindsight. It's good for seeing where you've been. It's good for testing the truth of what you think you know, but it can't tell you where you ought to go. (Robert M. Pirsig)
|
|
|
ropie
Administrator
Member
Offline
Age: 35
Location: SW London
Posts: 1210
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2010, 08:42:11 AM » |
|
That really is very nice indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ian
Administrator
Member
Offline
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
Posts: 2056
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2010, 09:13:22 AM » |
|
Hi Andrew, Well you set out to respect the original design and proportions and you have certainly done that with some style. Congratulations!
The way you have installed your arm is particularly clever and makes the Linn look as though it belongs.
Great stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And it appears to be a long time, Such a long, long, long time before the dawn.
|
|
|
|
gninnam
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2010, 12:24:57 PM » |
|
Agree with all the previous comments. A truelly well thought out and executed project - you should be proud of yourself 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All the best - Andy
|
|
|
|
pete
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2010, 02:45:48 PM » |
|
Great work Andrew! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
pete 'easy and convenient'
|
|
|
|
arossphoto
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2010, 03:07:58 PM » |
|
I do have to agree with David about the rubber footers under the tone arm pod however, I think you'll have better results with a rigid mount or small brass cones. Floating arm pods rarely give the rigidity you need for good frequency extension and focus.
Thanks again for all the positive comments. It took a long time to get here with lots of advance planning, and feedback from other members here. I couldn't have done it without lots of help and web surfing for ideas. The inspiration for the tonearm pillar came from this 6moons article about a custom Garrard plinth. I was also inspired by the design of the Pioneer P3, which used a removable exterior shell. I will definitely scrap the rubber feet. The original idea was to just bolt the base of the tonearm pillar to the bottom layer, but then I started to think it might be a good idea to have some separation. The other option I considered was separating the bottom layer with some brass washers to isolate it and the tonearm from the the upper layers. That's why I haven't glued the bottom in place yet. I am still undecided on the best approach, so any feedback is much appreciated. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 05:38:05 PM by arossphoto »
|
Logged
|
Andrew
|
|
|
|
pete
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2010, 03:32:57 PM » |
|
Well you took that idea and made it your own!  It's really inspiring work Andrew! What veneer are you gonna use?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
pete 'easy and convenient'
|
|
|
|
arossphoto
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2010, 03:47:59 PM » |
|
Thanks Pete. I'm going to use Walnut veneer. I considered something more exotic, but I also wanted to use paper backed veneer because I was planning to round the corners off like the original plinth. It's hard to find exotic veneer that is paper backed, so I went with something more traditional. I've change my mind about rounding the corners off, and I think it was overly ambitious to think I could wrap the veneer around the entire plinth and bend the corners. I've never done this before, so I didn't want to screw it up after all this work. What I love about this design is that I can always build another surround or skin for the outside and just pop it on top of the base.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 03:50:00 PM by arossphoto »
|
Logged
|
Andrew
|
|
|
|