nic
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2010, 03:55:43 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flavio81
Member
 
Offline
Location: Lima, Peru
Posts: 665
Science over myth
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2010, 04:00:18 PM » |
|
the other is a salvage, which always had problems playing CDs, skipping occasionally and unpredictably. Philips/Magnavox replaced it for the customer under warranty and told us to throw the old one away but I kept it for spare parts (except the CDM 4 transport, which is probably defective) but never stripped anything out. Try replacing all electrolytic capacitors, especially the ones that control the transport. And be careful not to move the laser-power-adjustment potentiometer!! From what I remember of the stock CDB582 (has it been THAT long?), it was smooth and "euphonic." Unlike many CD players, one could listen to it for hours at a time without fatigue.
Same with my player. I bought it for historical reasons (first Philips CD player in history!) but was rather surprised by the good sound. CDM0 mechanism! Pictures and info: http://www.marantzphilips.nl/marantz_cd63_first_cdplayer/I've read this Marantz (my model) was introduced a bit before the Philips CD100!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
The orientation turned from "what can we do" to "here's what you should buy."
|
|
|
Fidel Costar
Member
 
Online
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 392
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2010, 05:29:32 PM » |
|
It's interesting that you weren't impressed by the 582.
Hi Alex, In my experience, most cheap CD players do not age well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Christian
Circulez, y a rien à boire.
|
|
|
GP49
Member
Online
Age: 15
Location: East of the sun and west of the moon, USA
Posts: 6,594
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2010, 05:36:00 PM » |
|
Try replacing all electrolytic capacitors, especially the ones that control the transport. And be careful not to move the laser-power-adjustment potentiometer!!
Too late...when it was languishing in its "throw it away" phase, before I literally rescued it from the garbage can, we'd already done quite a bit of fiddling with it!! Actually since I marked the position of the pot, it's probably right where it was to begin with.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Gene
|
|
|
|
jaspert
Member
  
Offline
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,184
tubey & horny
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2010, 02:29:06 AM » |
|
What to do with Satch Dac board with TD 1541 chip? Put them in a leftover Lenco GL75 box until i know what to do with the DAC case. Ugly as but sounds good..  
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nic
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2010, 02:40:00 AM » |
|
Jaspert,
Can you give an impression or review of the Valab DAC? I'm thinking of getting one (or more) for computer audio around the house. There are 3 versions presently from what i see on ebay. Which is yours?
I'm aiming at the "luxury" with the improved onboard PS.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hatehifi
Member
Offline
Age: 71
Location: likely, Germany
Posts: 8,820
"fascinating times in which we are living"~grandpa
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: October 20, 2010, 05:18:39 AM » |
|
I don't think my for sale ad is still active, that is, I purchased 5 pieces NOS 1541A chips still in bubble pack with a preamp and these have been in the drawer since. Anybody interested? There is a gummed label on the bubble pack which indicates to me that these are not copies... Trades or cash?
|
|
|
Logged
|
John Little Feat (Mercenary Territory) "I've did my time in that rodeo. It's been so long and I've got nothing to show. Well I'm so plain loco, fool that I am I'd do it all over again."
|
|
|
jaspert
Member
  
Offline
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,184
tubey & horny
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2010, 02:37:26 PM » |
|
Jaspert,
Can you give an impression or review of the Valab DAC? I'm thinking of getting one (or more) for computer audio around the house. There are 3 versions presently from what i see on ebay. Which is yours?
I'm aiming at the "luxury" with the improved onboard PS.
Thanks in advance
Hi Nic, My Valab was from early 2009/late 2008 (no ventilation holes) and probably the only version available at the time i think. Comparing them, i think the older Valab is more akin to a Rega Planar 3 while the Satch Max with tube output stage is more like a modified Lenco, getting more details, lower noise floor and dynamic with the later.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DAC
Member
Offline
Posts: 1
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: October 24, 2011, 10:15:45 AM » |
|
Even today the Philips TDA1541 is a great chip with a good sound. In this link you can find numerous information about the Philips TDA1541, like the S1/S2 grading process, history, etc etc: http://www.dutchaudioclassics.nl/philips-tda1541.asp
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eldarvanyar
Member
 
Offline
Age: 58
Location: Battle, East Sussex
Posts: 431
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2011, 01:31:05 AM » |
|
The first CD player I bought was a CD50se in 1990 cost me £300 from Seven Oaks Hi-Fi in you guessed it Seven Oaks. I also bought a Cyrus II amp and Musical Fidelity MCII Speakers in Rosewood, and spent nearly £1000 which was a lot of money in 1990 when I was 23 years old. This had the TDA 1541 chip in it and I never really liked it to be honest, but I think that was much to do with the CDs and recordings at the time. I ended up buying an offboard DAC and was blown away by the sound, and ended up buying a dedicated Miromega Drive 1 and DAC1. I sold the Marantz to a friend and ended up getting it back last year from a friend he passed it on to, mainly due to sentimental reasons being my first Hi-Fi CD player. I use it now and again but now have it connected to my Cambridge Audio DAC Magic, so using it more for a transport. They seem to have a good reputation on the forums, but I prefer the Burr Brown Dacs in my AVI S2000 MC Ref Cd Player which is either 20bit or 24bit. Lee
|
|
|
Logged
|
Lee Currently using: Technics SL1200 Mk ii , Yamaha YP800, EAR 834P Firebottle Phono Clone, Quad 44 Pre, Quad 606 Power, Proac Response 1SC, B&W DM14, Van Damme Cables Recovering HiFi & GAS Nut- Now getting back to the Music (Hopefully)
|
|
|
|