Lenco Heaven
June 16, 2025, 05:37:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: CLICK HERE to Learn How to Post Images
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages:  «previous 1 ... 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ethernet cable extension upgrade  (Read 1359 times)
Fergus
Member
****
Online Online

Age: 68
Location: West Lothian, Scotland
Posts: 1,980


« Reply #45 on: July 15, 2024, 02:28:45 PM »

I do object to the rudeness above, however tongue in cheek it my seem to be.
I don’t think there is anything “tongue in cheek” about it!

Let’s keep it about Lenco and music and these differences can be played out elsewhere.
Logged
aboos
Member
**
Offline Offline

Location: Germany
Posts: 168


« Reply #46 on: July 15, 2024, 03:40:10 PM »

As said, I do not insist that my try for an explanation is indeed the root cause. What I want to say is that there may be a real difference but the root cause is not yet identified.
And yes, sometimes it is no difference and the perceived difference is pure imagination - I made a knot into the cable and therefore there must be a difference. Roll Eyes
But if we assume that there is a difference and people do not have only imagination, there must be a reason. And sometimes, I would wish that people put their brains together and try to identify possible root causes instead of telling each other that they are idiots, completely ignorant or even worse.
Identifying root causes in such cases would really bring us forward. Advances in technology and science only happen if people question the status quo and try to find causes for unexplainable observations.
Logged

Andreas
Clive
Member
*
Offline Offline

Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 45


« Reply #47 on: July 15, 2024, 05:53:10 PM »

As said, I do not insist that my try for an explanation is indeed the root cause. What I want to say is that there may be a real difference but the root cause is not yet identified.
And yes, sometimes it is no difference and the perceived difference is pure imagination - I made a knot into the cable and therefore there must be a difference. Roll Eyes
But if we assume that there is a difference and people do not have only imagination, there must be a reason. And sometimes, I would wish that people put their brains together and try to identify possible root causes instead of telling each other that they are idiots, completely ignorant or even worse.
Identifying root causes in such cases would really bring us forward. Advances in technology and science only happen if people question the status quo and try to find causes for unexplainable observations.
My hypothesis is that noise is getting into the system, Streamer and DAC (especially when they are integrated), possibly noise travels further down the chain too.  When I’ve spoken with digital designers they’ve told me that galvanic isolation (typically via a very small transformer) sounds like it’s perfect isolation but in reality this is far from the case.
Logged
Johnjc
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


« Reply #48 on: July 15, 2024, 07:04:01 PM »

I don’t think there is anything “tongue in cheek” about it!

Let’s keep it about Lenco and music and these differences can be played out elsewhere.
You have a good point and perhaps time for me to head to the background.
Logged
willbewill
Member
Member
*
Offline Offline

Location: Wales
Posts: 17,192


Psycho Acousticus


« Reply #49 on: July 15, 2024, 07:27:04 PM »

I played quite a few tracks from my test playlist using my Auralic Altair streaming DAC.  At first I thought I could hear a difference but as I tried more songs I decided I really couldn't hear any improvement.  Lots of factors in play here of course, different system to Vic's, different room etc.  Auralic, according to reviews, have gone to great lengths to reduce noise so maybe it the Altair doesn't need any extra help in this area or maybe my hearing isn't good enough to hear the difference Roll Eyes but it's usually good enough to hear other changes to my system.

So, it was worth a try given I respect Vic's opinions but not for me.

I concur with Ian listened to UHD tracks streamed from Amazon via Wiim Pro Plus into my Marantz PM6007 via optical and listened on Sony MDR-7506 headphones. Spent time plugging in and unplugging the cable in/out of chain over and over with the same tracks, like Ian I thought I could perceive a difference but after many swaps have come to the conclusion that it makes no difference in my system. But for the price of a cheap LP it was worth trying just to decide for myself.
Logged

malcolm ("You can't shine if you don't burn" - Kevin Ayers)

colorIf what I'm hearing is colouration, then bring on the whole rainbow color
Johnjc
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


« Reply #50 on: July 18, 2024, 07:46:15 AM »



Your perspective on psychoacoustics is intriguing and highlights an essential yet often overlooked aspect of sound perception. The discipline of psychoacoustics indeed bridges the gap between the physiological and psychological dimensions of hearing, offering valuable insights into how we perceive sound in various contexts.

It’s important to acknowledge that psychoacoustics does not dismiss the subjective experiences of listeners, even when these experiences cannot be directly correlated with measurable physical or electronic changes. Instead, it opens up a broader field of investigation, considering factors such as environmental conditions (like temperature affecting loudspeaker membranes) and individual differences in auditory perception. These factors underscore that our understanding of sound is not solely rooted in technical specifications but is also deeply influenced by our psychological and physiological makeup.

However, the critique that this field is often misunderstood or misrepresented, especially to non-technical audiences, is valid. The misconception that unexplained auditory effects make listeners appear foolish is a misinterpretation of the field’s findings. Psychoacoustics aims to explore and explain these phenomena, not to undermine the listener’s experience.

Moreover, dismissing anecdotal evidence with non-arguments such as "You need to try first" or "I hear it" without further investigation is indeed counterproductive. It’s crucial to approach these claims with a balance of open-mindedness and scientific rigor. Encouraging blind tests and empirical research rather than outright rejection or uncritical acceptance can foster a more nuanced understanding of sound perception.

In summary, psychoacoustics enriches our comprehension of auditory experiences, acknowledging both the measurable and the subjective elements of sound. It encourages a scientific approach to understanding these experiences while respecting the listener’s perception, paving the way for continued research and discovery in the field.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2024, 08:10:52 AM by Johnjc » Logged
Johnjc
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


« Reply #51 on: July 18, 2024, 08:23:44 AM »

On a more personal front I see perception as part of our neurodiverse experience, one that is unique to the individual.
The trouble with the whole objective Vs subjective experience, is that the understanding of sound is objective and the enjoyment of music is subjective. The two can sometimes clash.
In the end I don't have anything to prove I am happy with my subjective experience of music.
Logged
Pages:  «previous 1 ... 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

2009-2025 LencoHeaven

Page created in 0.156 seconds with 18 queries.